View Full Version : Questions about Firing, Quitting, and ADD

09-06-06, 10:57 PM
Our worst nightmare happened today. My husband lost his job today. He's been working as a retail manager with a video game store.

In a nutshell, he was dx about 4 months ago. Since then he's been working about 50-80 hours a week, either because he was trying so hard to get more organized or because the company was cutting hours so severely and expecting managers to do it all. His numbers/profits were good. He was a good manager but because of the ADD he was still having difficulty keeping paperwork filed and other rudimentary daily tasks up to date. Heck, managers who don't have ADD were struggling too but somehow were getting by. Now, here are my questions:

1. My husband's boss was given orders to fire him. But he told my husband it would be better for him to quit. If he was fired, he wouldn't be eligible for rehire and that would be entered into some sort of database, which future potential employers would see and it would be difficult for him to get a good job again. If he quit, they would put him down as eligible for rehire. Is this true?

2. My husband's immediate boss knew about his ADD and that he was trying to work on it along with medication but I don't think it was ever documented with HR. Can he still file a complaint?

3. My husband said he's heard that retail management is one of the worst jobs for ADD'ers. Is this true?


*~ žEEK ~*
09-07-06, 04:41 AM
1. My husband's boss was given orders to fire him. But he told my husband it would be better for him to quit. If he was fired, he wouldn't be eligible for rehire and that would be entered into some sort of database, which future potential employers would see and it would be difficult for him to get a good job again. If he quit, they would put him down as eligible for rehire. Is this true? Never Never Never Quit! Make them fire you instead! Otherwise you will not qualify for unemployment. If you quit you will get no unemplyement money while you search for another job! Also, if you quit, they won't have to document why they were going to fire you in the first place!

Honestly, do you really think they would hire him again anyway??? Probably not!

Is there any guarantee that his boss will enter into this so called database that he is eligible for rehire??? Probably not!

There is no database that "All" employers can access. That's a bunch of bull-hokey! If there was such a database, there would be a huge "civil" lawsuit. However, there might be a database that the company he works for might have, but other employers from other companies certainly wouldn't be able to access that database. Otherwise you could sue their pants off. This is just their attempt at trying get him to quit so they won't have to pay for his unemployment.

2. My husband's immediate boss knew about his ADD and that he was trying to work on it along with medication but I don't think it was ever documented with HR. Can he still file a complaint?. See ** below.

3. My husband said he's heard that retail management is one of the worst jobs for ADD'ers. Is this true? I personally wouldn't know since I've never worked in retail or retail management. Sorry!


** I recommend that you (And all ADDers for that matter!) purchase the book
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=j>Every Employees Guide to the Law by Joel G. Lewin, III </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>That book should answer most of the questions that you have, and if it doesn't, it will tell you who to contact to find out the answers.

Unfortunately, people with ADD have high turnover rates at their jobs. Not knowing what your rights are, or what the current laws are, is asking for a lifetime of heartache!

Even if you don't have ADD this book is an indispensable tool! The book is very easy to read, is available in paperback, and is inexpensive! What more could one ask for! :)

Heck, I'll even provide you with an link for the book!

However in your case bekahboo, I would head for the nearest bookstore now (Today!!) to find the book! I don't think you better wait for a book to arrive thru the U.S. mail. It sounds like you are running out of time if you haven't already!

Good luck and keep me posted on how things go, ok? :)

Peace! :)


*~ žEEK ~*
09-08-06, 11:03 PM
I stumbled upon this while looking up some other information. :)


Legal Rights: Higher Education and the Workplace (WWK14)

<HR>WWK refers to the What We Know series of information sheets on AD/HD. See the complete list ( See the PDF version ( of this sheet.
<HR>Although a diagnosis of AD/HD is the first step in initiating medical, educational, and mental health treatments, the diagnosis itself does not guarantee that the adult with AD/HD has the right to receive accommodations in the workplace or higher education. This sheet provides an overview of the legal requirements and protections afforded individuals appropriately diagnosed with AD/HD.
This sheet will:

explain how the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (RA) and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (<?XML:NAMESPACE PREFIX = ST1 /><ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY>) prohibit discrimination against individuals with disabilities
describe the documentation required to afford individuals with protection under RA or <ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY>
explain how RA and <ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY> apply to higher education and the workplace
Two federal laws -- The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (RA)<SUP>1</SUP> and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (<ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY>)<SUP>2 </SUP>-- prohibit discrimination against individuals with disabilities in higher education and the workplace. Some state laws may go further than these federal laws in prohibiting discrimination so check with your state government or an attorney who practices in your jurisdiction to determine your rights under state law in addition to the applicable federal laws. Adults with AD/HD may sometimes be eligible for protection and accommodations in higher education and the workplace under these laws.
RA and <ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY>: What are they?

The RA prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities in three areas: (1) employment by the executive branch of the federal government, (2) employment by most federal government contractors, and (3) activities funded by federal subsidies or grants, including companies or organizations receiving federal funding. The federally-funded category includes all public elementary and secondary schools, many private schools, and most higher education institutions. The RA, in the discrimination context, is often referred to by the name of one of its sections: Section 504.

The ADA extends the concepts of the RA to (1) private employers with 15 or more employees (Title I), (2) all activities of state and local governments, including employment and education (Title II), and (3) "places of public accommodation," including most private schools and higher education institutions (Title III). Most educational institutions and virtually all private schools are covered by the <ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY> and RA, depending upon the type of government funding they receive. Religiously controlled educational institutions that do not receive government funding, however, are exempt from these laws.

Recent court cases demonstrate that there are limitations in the protections of the RA and <ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY> as applied to state governmental agencies, particularly with regard to suits for monetary damages. For example, in Board of Trustees of the <ST1:PLACETYPE w:st="on">University</ST1:PLACETYPE> of <ST1:PLACENAME w:st="on">Alabama</ST1:PLACENAME> v. Garrett<SUP>3</SUP>, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a suit seeking money damages, based upon the failure of <ST1:STATE w:st="on">Alabama</ST1:STATE> to accommodate employees with disabilities under Title I of the <ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY>, was barred by the Constitution. Other cases suggest that suits for money damages brought against state educational institutions by students with disabilities for failure to accommodate under Title II of the <ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY> are also barred by the Constitution. It has even been suggested that the <ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY> and RA do not require states to provide accommodations for individuals with disabilities but only to refrain from intentional discrimination against them.

RA and <ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY>: Who is Eligible?

It is important to realize that being diagnosed as having AD/HD does not automatically make an individual eligible for protection or accommodations under the RA or <ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY>. The protections of these laws extend to individuals who meet four conditions: (1) they are individuals with disabilities under the law; (2) they are otherwise qualified for the position, with or without reasonable accommodations; (3) they are being excluded from employment or education solely by reason of their disability; and (4) they are covered by the applicable federal law. These laws essentially require that covered higher educational institutions and employers may not discriminate against qualified persons with disabilities. Persons with disabilities are individuals with impairments, such as AD/HD, that substantially limit a major life activity. We will clearly define the legal concepts of "impairment," "physical or mental impairment," "substantially limits," "major life activity," and "otherwise qualified."

Disability: A person with a disability is defined under the law as -- any individual who has a physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more of such person's major life activities, has a record of such an impairment, or is regarded as having such an impairment."<SUP>4</SUP> The definition of a "physical or mental impairment" includes -- any mental or psychological disorder, such as mental retardation, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, and specific learning disabilities."<SUP>5</SUP> Although AD/HD is not specifically mentioned in the regulations, it has been recognized in many court cases as a "mental or psychological disorder" and is therefore covered.

Substantially Limits: The impact of the impairment must be substantial, e.g., a major degree of impairment. The laws compare the individual with a disability to the average person in the general populationto determine what is substantial. "Substantially limits" means that the individual is "unable to perform a major life activity that the average person in the general population can perform" or is "significantly restricted as to the condition, manner, or duration" of performing the major life activity in question, when measured against the "average person in the general population."<SUP>6</SUP>

What if an individual with AD/HD uses effective coping strategies to deal with the AD/HD (e.g., medication or behavioral/psychological techniques), and as a result no longer has a substantial limitation to his performance compared to the average person? Under these circumstances, that adult with AD/HD is no longer eligible for accommodations under the RA or the <ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY>. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that we must assess the individual's actual functioning, taking into account the positive and negative effects of all the treatments such as medication or compensatory behavioral/psychological interventions that the person is receiving.<SUP>7</SUP> We cannot exclude the effects of medication or other helpful compensatory techniques when comparing the individual to the average person; the individual still must be unable to perform the activity compared to the average person, even with medication and other compensations. Clearly, some people with AD/HD who are benefiting from effective treatment may no longer pass this test of having substantially lower performance on a major life activity than the average person in the population.

Major Life Activity: The major life activities under RA and ADA include self-care activities, manual tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning, and work.<SUP>8</SUP> Learning and work are the two major life activities most relevant to adults with AD/HD. With regard to learning, the individual's impairment must substantially limit him or her in a broad area of learning, not just in a particular course of study.<SUP>9</SUP> A medical student at the University of New Mexico School of Medicine argued in court that his anxiety when taking chemistry and physics tests should be sufficient evidence of substantial impairment to his learning ability; the Court ruled against him, arguing that he failed to show that he had a disability because he did not present evidence that his mental impairment (anxiety) impedes his performance in a wide variety of disciplines, not just chemistry and physics.

In order to be substantially limited in the major life activity of working, the impairment must prevent the individual from succeeding in an entire class of jobs, not just a particular job. A secretary with AD/HD requested her own office to avoid distractibility; the request was denied because her disability did not prevent her from succeeding in all secretarial jobs. In fact, a circuit court has ruled that for the impact of a disability to be sufficient under the <ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY>, it must not only be confined to the workplace, but must also affect other aspects of the individual's life.<SUP>10</SUP>

Otherwise Qualified: "Otherwise qualified" means that the individual would be eligible for the educational program or the job with or without a reasonable accommodation, e.g., despite their disability, they meet the basic requirements for a particular job or school program. In one case on this issue, the court upheld the employment termination of a neurologist with AD/HD, arguing that there was no duty to accommodate him because he was a direct threat to his patients.<SUP>11</SUP> The court found that he had made errors in patient charts and dispensing medicine and that he had stated that it was only a matter of time until he hurt someone. The neurologist was not qualified for his job because of his deficits. Despite his disability, he was not eligible for protection under the <ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY>.

What Documentation is Required?

Some reports written by clinicians to document the diagnosis of AD/HD may often be insufficient to receive protection under RA or <ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY>. For a report from a mental health professional to be sufficient documentation under RA or <ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY>, it must include the following elements:

The professional's report should clearly identify the individual's physical or mental impairment, using the current version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual whenever possible.
The report should clearly describe the impairment's impact on the individual's ability to perform one or more of the major life activities (learning, work). A description of the positive and negative effects of any medication and compensatory strategies should be included.
The report should compare the individual's ability to perform the identified major life activity to the average member of the population. Bear in mind that the average person may perform the life activity in question imperfectly. The comparison should demonstrate that the limitation is substantial compared to the average person.
The report should demonstrate that the individual is qualified for the job or educational program, despite the disability.
The report should recommend accommodations necessary to address the disability described, showing why these accommodations are necessary and how they are reasonable.
How do RA and <ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY> apply to higher education?

Under the RA and <ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY>, most higher education institutions must accommodate qualified individuals with disabilities. It is the student's responsibility to disclose his/her disability to the college and show that s/he is qualified for the program; the college is not required to seek out students with disabilities. The accommodations requested by the student must be both reasonable and necessary because of the particular disability. The institution is not required to make modifications in courses or examinations that would alter the essential nature of its program, or would constitute an undue hardship on the institution.

Examples of reasonable accommodations include note-taking assistance and extended time and an individual room for taking tests and examinations. Examples of accommodations that may not always be legally required include foreign language or mathematics requirement waivers or course substitutions. If the educational institution can justify the need for mastery of a foreign language or mathematics in a particular course of study, then it can compel students with disabilities to meet this requirement. If calculus and differential equations are required for a major in physics, an individual with a learning disability or AD/HD cannot be excused from these mathematics classes on the basis of the disability.

How do RA and <ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY> apply in the workplace?

The bar against discrimination in the workplace applies to recruitment, advertising and job application processes, hiring, upgrading, promotion, award of tenure, discharge, demotion, transfer, layoff, rehiring, compensation, leave, and various benefits. To be eligible for such protection, an employee must disclose the disability to the employer. Employees with disabilities who are qualified for their jobs may be entitled to reasonable accommodations in the workplace. However, in many cases it may be difficult for the employee, especially where cognitive impairments are involved, to establish that he or she is both substantially limited in a major life activity and at the same time qualified for the job. The accommodations sought must also be reasonable, and reasonableness depends upon the nature of the particular job.

In one case a senior-level executive with AD/HD requested a non-distracting workplace, multi-staged tasks, written instructions, intermediate deadlines, a single supervisor, and assistance in setting up a time management system. The court denied these accommodations, ruling that senior-level employees must be able to exercise independent judgment and juggle tasks when necessary. Such accommodations may be reasonable for junior level employees but not for senior employees. In another case, a school district required that its teachers take turns driving school buses. A qualified teacher who had a disability that prevented him from driving was denied a job and took legal action. The court ruled that since driving a school bus was not an essential part of teaching, the school district could not deny the otherwise qualified teacher a job because he could not drive a school bus.

The accommodation must be specific. For example, an employer is not required to provide reduced stress in the workplace because the employer would not be able to control all of the factors that produce stress. Furthermore, compliance by the employer would depend upon the employee's assessment of his or her stress level at any given time. The employee must prove that there is a need for the accommodations based upon the disability; the employee's desire for the accommodations is not sufficient. For example, the employee cannot insist upon the day shift rather than the night shift simply because the employee prefers the day shift.

Over 90 percent of <ST1:CITY w:st="on"><ST1:PLACE w:st="on">ADA</ST1:PLACE></ST1:CITY> cases are won by employers because of the difficulties showing the reasonableness of the accommodations and proving that the employee is substantially limited but nonetheless qualified for the job. Before taking legal action, it is important to evaluate your legal position and to consider the possibility of informally working out a mutually acceptable solution with your employer. Many employers will agree to make reasonable accommodations in order to improve the performance of the employee. In the event legal action is pursued, professional documentation of the disability and the need for accommodations will be of great importance.

09-09-06, 01:45 AM
My gut instincts tell me seek is right.

10-30-06, 04:15 AM
Yeah in my situation the end paragraphs could work against me in a suit. However I told my employer repeatedly what I needed for accomodation and they refused to do it even though it would have cost them nothing and I would have been able to do my job.

10-31-06, 01:22 PM
moving shadow, come on! you can EASILY sue this employer! if you are asking for a "reasonable" accommadation, they should be able to accomadate you. Get some help, NOW! first things first....write a letter to HR AND your supervisor(I assume you have probably done this?). You HAVE to have things in writing. State what you are asking for, and state the disability.

11-05-06, 12:36 AM
I agree - that whole thing about the "fired folks database" is absolute bunk. It's either misinformation or an outright malicious lie. In fact, in at least some states there is a legally mandated "neutral reference policy", meaning that employers cannot say anything negative about you at all. They can only confirm employment dates and pay rate.

I agree with those who suggested that your husband stay on until he is formally fired. There are a couple of reasons for this. First, it gives him the option of collecting unemployment if and when he is terminated. Second, he has some time now to begin searching for a job while he is still earning a paycheck from the current job.

From the standpoint of references and obtaining future employment, there should be no difference whatsoever whether he quits under pressure or is terminated. There is therefore nothing to lose in staying on, and a fair amount to gain financially.

As to the question of retail/retail management being bad for AD/HDers, I'm not sure about that. I've worked retail on and off since age 16 and I've always really enjoyed it and been quite good at it. But I can't speak to the management end since I've never done that.