View Full Version : Why did the chicken cross the road?


Zach326
01-18-07, 08:42 PM
"Why did the chicken cross the road?

Skeptico is one year old today! Hard to believe, but my first post, Drivel from Chopra (http://skeptico.blogs.com/skeptico/2005/02/_a_friend_sent_.html), was on February 3<sup>rd</sup> 2005. (Some things never change (http://skeptico.blogs.com/skeptico/2006/01/more_chopra_dri.html), it seems.)<o></o>

Anyway, I’m not going to bore you with details of how many posts I’ve made, how many visitors, etc etc. You don’t care. Instead, I started thinking about all the people we’ve met over the past year, and wondered how they might answer the age old question of this post’s title. So, in celebration of Skeptico’s first birthday, and for (what I hope will be) your Friday amusement, I present the various answers to the question…<o></o>

Why did the chicken cross the road?"

http://skeptico.blogs.com/skeptico/2006/02/why_did_the_chi.html

No matter how you feel about skeptics (of any kind), you have to admit this is funny... or at the very least, I have to admit it is funny ... which is what I am doing now...

...

admitting that it is funny... <o></o>:eyebrow:

Nova
01-19-07, 08:48 PM
The answers are humorous, Z !

The dern chicken was b-o-r-e-d !

LoL !! (0:

SB_UK
01-19-07, 11:17 PM
heyZ
because.

...one of the philosophy exams - I think.

Q.Why?
A.Beacause
100%

A2. Why not?
Pass

Oi vey!!!
enough already !!!
can't you just do a proper degree?
... don't think - we weren't put on this world to think.

I think the anti-philosoph above'll be wakin' with a headache soon.

Incidentally the metamodel web is built on structured information and that information leads to an enforced moral consistency.
I believe that a reaction to an action (considered by most to be counter their own moral code - even if subconscious) - is --- the reaction to immorral action is to push forwards development of a better stronger web.
It's real prosaic.
The 'worse' 'we' are - the faster our (logical) models react to seal the loop hole.

This form of logic - I believe can be used to rationalise the development of strong schools of philosophical thought over the history of man - these schools as being of 'magnitude' equivalent and reactive to a culture enforcing a form of morality running counter the individual's deep held nature.

The reaction presents as the evolutionary drive.

Funny that we look -now- through the eyes of reaction to action - and not the common stance of 'action'

Does light push - or dark pull?

http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j132/sb_camsci/_meta-antisyzygy-nymy_.gif

Nova
01-19-07, 11:41 PM
I totally adore you, S.

You fell right into the 'contribution trap'.

Hahahaha !!!!


Stop thinking !!!!!!!!

Go play !

I know I can get away with telling you that. (0:

SB_UK
01-20-07, 10:53 AM
You fell right into ...boink.

meadd823
01-20-07, 11:10 AM
Do I always have to be the weird one?

I found Zack's reason for editing equally entertianing

Last edited by Zach326 : 01-18-07 at 07:54 PM. Reason: Vast universal inter-connectedness made me do it!


Okay so I notice people's reasons for editing, I find some pretty cool stuff under the line.