View Full Version : quantum theories of thought process


murphy40
04-17-08, 01:18 PM
what some scientist may call 'genius' may simply be the greater ability to accest the Zero Point Field (a energy force in the universe). In that sense, our intelligence, creativity and imagination are not locked in our brains but exist with an interaction with The Field.
A field is a matrix or medium which connects two or more points in space, usually via a force, like gravity or electromagnetism. Represented by ripples in the field or waves. An electromagnetic feild (ex:) is an electrical feild and a magnetic field which interesect, sending out waves of energy at the speed of light. They form around any electric charge. Scientists believe our thoughts travel this way and our memory has collective memory resonance. If ADD'ers put out so many numerous thoughts a minute, it seems to me that we are receiving a constant wave in our receptive thoughts and memories which we may not be able to compute. Which makes sense as to lack of focus and so on.

Just a thought. I'm no scientist. But quantum physics have made me aware of the capabilities of our brain's wide spectrum of possibilities.:confused:

Scattershot
04-17-08, 02:09 PM
You're right on in your thoughts here. I'll try to dig through some of my notes on this stuff & post a couple of references later, but I wanted to comment and say that I completely agree with your hypothesis.

There are studies showing that ADDers have more of certain brainwave frequencies, which makes me think we probably do "tune in" to the Zero Point field a little differently than the normies. I also have enough personal experiences that don't make any sense without the framework of a pervasive energy field connecting everyone.

SB_UK
04-19-08, 11:11 AM
~s (http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2001/sep/30/robinmckie.theobserver)~

Nobel laureate, Cambridge physicist Brian Josephson. 'Yes, I think telepathy exists,' he told The Observer, 'and I think quantum physics will help us understand its basic properties.'

just dropping this off from another thread -
- back in a sec

:-)

(an ADD second)

qinkin
04-20-08, 01:04 AM
by 0 balancing,
means NUETRALIZING.


zero-point energy is the lowest possible energy that a quantum mechanical physical system may possess and is the energy of the ground state of the system.


is it all balanced?? which is the neutral spot?? of all!?

murphic formulation:
creativity and imagination are not locked in our brains but exist with an interaction with

Intelligent Design == a Scientific Theory.. similiar to Quantam Mechanics/Neural Mechanics (but not limited to)

the Pyschology of Religion is == Intellignet Design Theory in Science

This zero-point energy (which comes from all the types of force fields--electromagnetic, gravitational and nuclear) makes itself felt in several ways, most of them obvious only to a physicist. One is the Lamb shift, which refers to a slight frequency alteration in the light emitted by an excited atom. Another is a particular kind of inescapable, low-level noise that registers in electronic and optical equipment.

Hence, Goal Keepers sport a 0, in soccer,
responsible for perpetual motion of the game:)

Spongedaddy
05-12-08, 06:16 PM
by 0 balancing,
means NUETRALIZING.



is it all balanced?? which is the neutral spot?? of all!?

murphic formulation:


Intelligent Design == a Scientific Theory.. similiar to Quantam Mechanics/Neural Mechanics (but not limited to)

the Pyschology of Religion is == Intellignet Design Theory in Science



Hence, Goal Keepers sport a 0, in soccer,
responsible for perpetual motion of the game:)


I would have to say though that spirituality = Intelligent Design and Psychology of Religion = doctrine.

I have seen too much in this world not to believe in Intelligent Design. Heck string theory is proving everything is connected (the spiritual people like Jesus, Buddha etc. knew this).

qinkin
05-13-08, 01:12 PM
I see believing as seeing/experiencing.. they are never seperate

I have seen too much in this world not to believe in Intelligent Design. The Field. which, as SB illustrated for awhile
Indra's Net (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indra%27s_net)
akin


Three Spheres II (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Spheres_II)
Indra's thunderbolt (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vajra)
Butterfly effect (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect)

The kinetic energy of a tornado is ultimately provided by the sun and the butterfly can only influence certain details of weather events in a chaotic manner.

zoomman
05-29-08, 12:39 PM
Reminded me of what I read recently about the ancient Greek (pre-Socratic) "school" of philosophers known as the Eleatics and their notion that All is One, and it is the limitation of sensory experience that makes it all seem aught.

Indeed, Bell's Theorem (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bells_Theorem#Practical_experiments_testing_Bell.2 7s_theorem) demonstrates, it would seem (for I have nothing like the mathematical mind capable of any but the most rudimentary explanation (http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/kenny/papers/bell.html), and even then, I prefer a clear layperson's explanation (http://www.upscale.utoronto.ca/PVB/Harrison/BellsTheorem/Analogy.html)) something like INSTANTANEOUS communication occurs throughout the universe. If, as it seems to be, all so-called matter is in constant instantaneous communication with all other "matter" and we are nothing but the same, then we are, as it were, constantly communicating with all else all the time.

It would seem, then, that the Eleatics may have been on to something. One big field of "?" (call it energy), and we are limited in our sensory perception of it. The Eleatics, then, said, we could only get at all of this via thought because our senses were not to be trusted.

What if, then, the "Zero-point" field is simply the buzz of all that instantaneous communication? AdHd people are blessed with a very egalitarian awareness, admitting much more information into our awareness than pre-adhd humans; it's what wears us out; makes us skittish. We surely perceive bits of zero point information. We hear the universe speaking or singing.

A final thought and then I'll shut up and slink back under your bed.

It is rewarding, if not potentially enlightening, to reflect on the word "universe." From Latin universum, meaning "whole," the word comprises two stems: uni- from unus, meaning "one," and "versus" from the past participle of the Latin verb, "vertere" to turn. One turn. Only ever always, one turn. A circle. So a circle symbolizes both all (universe) and nothing (zero).

Anyone can hear it if they learn how to listen. We of the add strain of humanity, like some other strains, hear it better than many.

Peace.